Explainer-What we know about Virginia Giuffre’s lawsuit against Britain’s Prince Andrew

By Luc Cohen

NEWYORK – Britain’s Prince Andrew on Thursday had his army hyperlinks and royal patronages got rid of, a day after a U.S. judge allowed a civil case introduced by means of Virginia Giuffre accusing the prince of sexually abusing her while she used to be 17 to transport forward.

The following is a summary of the lawsuit and what it manner for Andrew:

WHATAREGIUFFRE‘S CLAIMSAGAINSTANDREW?

Giuffre, additionally referred to as Virginia Roberts, sued https://www.reuters.com/criminal/govt/prince-andrew-is-sued-through-jeffrey-epstein-accuser-over-alleged-sexual-abuse-2021-08-09 the Duke of York in Big Apple in 2021, claiming that he sexually assaulted and battered her.

Giuffre said Andrew pressured her to have sex on the London house of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British socialite and Epstein’s longtime affiliate, and at homes owned by way of Epstein.

Epstein, a instructor-turned-globetrotting financier, died via suicide in a Ny prison cell phone in 2019 at the age of SIXTY SIX whilst watching for trial on intercourse abuse fees. Maxwell, 60, used to be convicted https://www.reuters.com/international/us/maxwell-jury-resume-deliberations-after-judge-warns-omicron-possibility-2021-12-29 on Dec. 29, 2021, of intercourse trafficking and other crimes.

HOWHASANDREWRESPONDED?

Andrew’s lawyers have called the lawsuit “baseless https://www.reuters.com/global/uk/britains-prince-andrew-challenge-us-court-jurisdiction-accusers-lawsuit-2021-09-THIRTEEN″ and accused Giuffre of in search of a payday. They argued that Giuffre signed away her right to sue the prince in a 2009 settlement with Epstein, and on Jan. FOUR suggested U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan to brush aside the lawsuit for that reason.

Andrew, 61, told https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-royals-andrew/prince-andrew-says-he-does-now not-remember-meeting-epstein-accuser-idUSKBN1XP2CX the BBC in November 2019 that he could not have had sex with Giuffre at Maxwell’s house as a result of he had returned to his space that night time after a youngsters’s party.

WHYDIDJUDGEKAPLANALLOWTHESUIT TO CONTINUE?

Kaplan said https://www.reuters.com/international/europe/us-judge-rejects-prince-andrews-bid-brush aside-intercourse-abuse-accusers-lawsuit-2022-01-12 it was too soon to determine whether Giuffre and Epstein – a convicted sex culprit – meant for the 2009 payment to liberate Andrew.

He additionally said it was premature to think about the prince’s efforts to cast doubt on Giuffre’s claims, even though he could be in a position to accomplish that at a trial.

WHATARETHECONSEQUENCES OF THELAWSUITFORANDREW?

The allegations have done vital injury to the prince’s reputation. On Thursday, Buckingham Palace stated https://www.reuters.com/global/us/prince-andrews-criminal-staff-decline-comment-us-courtroom-choice-2022-01-13 Andrew would now not be referred to as “His Royal Highness” after dropping his royal and army hyperlinks, and said he was once defending the Giuffre case as a personal citizen.

Andrew had already stepped down from public duties days after a November 2019 interview with the BBC during which critics mentioned https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-royals-andrew-tasks/britains-prince-andrew-halts-public-duties-over-sex-scandal-idUSKBN1XU2CW he failed to deal with key questions about his ties to Epstein.

If the case goes to trial and Giuffre wins, Andrew may well be ordered to pay Giuffre damages. She has requested for an unspecified amount.

COULDTHELAWSUITLEAD TO CRIMINALJEOPARDYFORANDREW?

No. Andrew has now not been charged criminally, and no felony charges may outcome from Giuffre’s lawsuit since it is a civil case.

Andrew time and again declined requests through federal prosecutors within the United States for an interview approximately their probe into Epstein’s sex trafficking, former U.S. Lawyer for the Southern District of New York Geoffrey Berman mentioned in June 2020.

A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s place of job declined to remark. It was once no longer clear if prosecutors still need to consult Andrew.

WHYDOESGIUFFRE‘S SETTLEMENTWITHEPSTEINMATTER?

The cost settlement said “every other person or entity who can have been included as a possible defendant from all, and all manner of, action and movements of Virginia Roberts” used to be released from liability.

David Boies, a lawyer for Giuffre, earlier this month known as the liability unencumber in the 2009 settlement “inappropriate” to the case against Andrew.

WHAT’S THESTATUS OF THELAWSUIT?

The litigation is at an early stage. Kaplan has mentioned a potential trial https://www.reuters.com/global/us-pass judgement on-objectives-past due-2022-civil-trial-prince-andrew-sex-abuse-case-2021-11-03 could get started among September and December 2022.

IS GIUFFRE‘S LAWSUITRELATED TO MAXWELL‘S CONVICTION?

No. Giuffre didn’t testify in Maxwell’s prison trial, and her allegations didn’t shape the basis of any of the six sex abuse counts towards her.

DOESANDREW‘S POSITION AS A PRINCEAFFECTTHECASE?

Diplomats are often entitled to a certain degree of legal immunity in the international locations in which they are published. Heads of state – reminiscent of Andrew’s mom, Queen Elizabeth II – are entitled to a point of immunity to boot.

Even before the removal on Thursday of his royal patronages and armed forces links, Andrew did not seem to fit both class, consistent with Craig Barker, a law professor at London South Bank School.

“There’s not anything i will see in the law that might counsel that he might have any entitlement to immunity in anyway, whether that be in civil or certainly in prison issues,” Barker stated.

Leave a comment

SMM Panel